FAHRAS The index of contemporary Arab cultural production, and the desk the research team
documents it from. This is what the two demos above show.Being built now
WRKBK The parallel index for craft industries, workshops and material practice. Same
consent architecture, different subject.Parallel build
HEKMAT The assistant layer over both, and over partner indexes that consent to join it.
Reads; never writes; never trains.After deployment
The desk comes first. A researcher approaches an artist, holds the interview, and reviews the
transcript field by field, accepting or correcting what was extracted from it.
The form follows. Once that review is signed off, the artist is sent a link — in the same email
as the participant agreement — carrying those confirmed values back to them. They are checking a page
rather than composing one.
Corrections return as evidence. What the artist changes is flagged as coming from them, at the
highest source reliability, and kept alongside the original rather than overwriting it.
Nothing publishes without approval. The finished record goes back to the artist exactly as it
would appear, and publication is blocked until an approval exists for that version.
On the desk: the artists in the pipeline each sit at a different phase, so every step is
reachable without working through the whole sequence. The stepper at the top of any record is clickable —
past phases open read-only.
The index: the left rail opens the published side of the same data — artist and work records,
the theme vocabulary, and institutions as records rather than typed strings, which is what makes
“who else studied there” a query rather than a text search.
Ask FAHRAS: search over the index that answers in sentences and cites the record behind every
claim. Ask it to rank artists, or for a year it holds nothing on, and it declines rather than inventing.
This is FAHRAS searching itself — not HEKMAT.
Roles: FAHRAS has three, as WRKBK does — Researcher, Supervisor, Admin. Sign in as Researcher,
then use Switch role. Approval is available only to the Supervisor and the switch is itself logged,
which is how self-approval stays visible while one person holds both roles.
Sharing: the fifth permission question is a matrix rather than a yes or no — the artist ticks the
places a moment from the conversation may appear, from Instagram to a conference talk to a catalogue essay, and
leaves the rest. Ticking a box releases nothing on its own: each use returns to them with the exact quotation or
clip for sign-off, and they can refuse one item without changing any of the answers.
On the form: note that there is no sign-in. Artists never hold an account; the link carries
the record to them and their answers back. The language toggle in the top right switches the whole form to Arabic with
right-to-left layout. Every question can be skipped, and a partial answer is a valid one.